| |
|
CULLODEN MOOR
AND
THE STORY OF THE BATTLE |
|
Night March
Towards Nairn - Chapter 3 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Lord George Murray |
|
|
ANOTHER bold scheme was
meanwhile resolved on - a night-attack on the English camp at bairn. It
was hoped, too, that the Soldiers might be the more likely to be found
napping, as they might be expected to over-indulge in the festivities of
their leaders birth-day. Lord George devised or cordially adopted the
proposal, it would seem, for one reason, as preferable to awaiting the
Royal army on the ill-selected field of battle. It was about three
o'clock in the afternoon of 15th April that the project was resolved on;
the intention being to set out at night-fall, about eight o'clock, with
the purpose of reaching the point of attack about two o'clock in the
morning. By some fatality, through a negligence which was attended with
the most disastrous consequences, a single biscuit or a small loaf or
oatmeal bannock, was all of nourishment that was available for each man.
Difficult as may have been the duties of the commissariat, they ought,
at this eventful crisis, to have been prosecuted with all possible
energy; and that they might have been so successfully, was demonstrated
by the fact, that on a serious but too late effort being made, a store
of food was collected, though not in time to reach the famished troops.
In the Lockhart Papers (vol. ii. p. 529), Mr. John Hay is said to have
been blamed by the army for the distress they were in for want of
provisions, he having the superintendence at the time, owing to the
illness of Secretary Murray, who is there stated to have been extremely
active in providing for the army.
"The scarcity of provisions" (says Mr. Chambers) "had none become so
great, that the men were on this important day reduced to the miserable
allowance of only one small loaf, and that of the worst kind. Strange as
the averment may appear, I have beheld and tasted a piece of the bread
served out in this occasion, being the remains of a loaf or bannock,
which had been carefully preserved for eighty-one years by the
successive members of a Jacobite family. It is impossible to imagine a
composition of greater coarseness, or less likely to please or satisfy
the appetite: and perhaps no recital, however eloquent, of the miseries
to which Charles's army was reduced, could have impressed the reader
with so strong an idea of the real extent of that misery as the sight of
this singular relic. Its ingredients appeared to be merely the husks of
oats and a coarse unclean species of dust, similar to what is found upon
the floors of a mill."
The quality of the bannock in question may possibly have been
exceptional; but whether so or not, the quantity on that day was at
starvation-point for soldiers in the field. Lord George, in his letter,
5th August 1749, to Hamilton of Bangour, says, with reference to the
want of provisions, as an alleged reason for not shifting their ground,
"I was convinced there was enough at Inverness which might even then
have been brought out, part to where we were, and part to Loch Moy,
where our army must have retired if the Duke of Cumberland did not cross
the Water of Nairn and give us an opportunity of fighting him to
advantage."
The first evil consequence of a want of a supply of provisions, was that
the men had gone to Inverness and about the country in search of
indispensable food. On the night-march being resolved on, the officers
went in search of the stragglers; "but, under the influence of hunger,
they told their commanders to shoot them if they pleased, rather than
compel them to starve any longer." Of the whole army concentrated at and
about Inverness, which comprised about 6000 men, less than two-thirds
assembled in the evening. In these circumstances it is no wonder that
Lord George Murray says - "Then, indeed, I do not know of one officer
who had been made acquainted with the resolution of surprising the
enemy, but declared, in the strongest terms, for laying it aside; much
was spoken by them all for not attempting it then; but his Royal
Highness continued bent on the thing, and gave me orders to march (he
embraced me at the same time), which I immediately did."
|
 |
|
|
Lord John Drummond |
|
|
It was in this untoward
state of affairs that the unfortunate night-march to Nairn was
commenced. The expedition marched in two consecutive columns; the first,
commanded by Lord George Murray, was composed of the Clans: Lord John
Drummond was with the rear of this division. The second column,
commanded by the Duke of Perth, consisted chiefly of the Lowland
regiments, and the Prince and he were in the central interval, of about
a quarter of a mile, between the two columns. Twenty to thirty of the
men of the MacIntosh regiment, who were familiar with the line of march,
and two officers, were distributed along the columns as guides. The
first column comprised about a third of the whole force; and the
intention was that they should cross to the south side of the Nairn when
within about 3 miles of the town, and then recross and attack the
English army in flank and rear, simultaneously with the onset on the
west by the second column.
The route lay near Dalcross Castle, an
interesting structure, built in 1620 by Simon, sixth Lord Lovat, but
then and still the property of MacIntosh of MacIntosh, which is
conspicuous on the summit of the ridge, about 3
miles |
|
north-west from the
scene of battle, and at a little distance north of Kilravock Castle,
which, with other buildings overhanging the river, about three miles
beyond Dalcross, has a fine old tower of the 15th century, and belongs
to a family - Rose of Kilravock, at one time powerful in the North -
remarkable for an unbroken male descent, retaining their baronial estate
for six centuries without the support of any clan of their name, in the
midst of jealous and ferocious neighbours.
The night was very
dark, the way devious, as houses were avoided; the ground was rough,
and, there being many obstacles, the men straggled a good deal. The rear
column did not keep pace with that in front, possibly in part owing to
its members not being all so nimble of foot, nor so accustomed to moor
ground and rough footing as the clansmen, though even of these several
fell behind, some from exhaustion. Repeated interruptions were
accordingly experienced to the advance of the leading column, by
messages to halt or slacken pace. By the time the front rank had reached
Knockanbuie, "the yellow knoll," intermediate between the present road
from Clephantown - a small hamlet on the line of the old military road,
now leading from Fort-George past Cawdor - to Nairn, and the river,
rather more than a couple of miles beyond Kilravock and nearly double
that distance from Nairn, it was found to be then so late as two o'clock
of the morning, the hour of meditated attack. The leaders, in a brief
consultation, came to the conclusion that it would be vain to persevere,
with any hope of not being discovered long before they could come upon
the enemy. The roll of a distant drum, indicating the English to be on
the alert, quickened their deliberations. Lord George, therefore, on his
own responsibility, according to some accounts - but according to
himself and others, not without communication with the Prince - ordered
the column to retrace their steps. Lord George himself says - "Mr.
O'Sullivan also came up to the front, and said his Royal Highness would
be very glad to have the attack made: but as Lord George Murray was in
the van, he could best judge whether it could be done in time or not.
Perhaps Mr. O'Sullivan may choose to forget this, but others are still
alive who heard him."
The Prince's indignation was great on ascertaining this retrograde
movement, and he is said to have exclaimed that Lord George Murray had
betrayed him. But there is much to say for the view that it was in the
exercise of a wise discretion that the attempted surprise was abandoned,
and the Prince afterwards acknowledged as much. Had it been persisted
in, the enemy would not have been taken quite at unawares, as the Duke
of Cumberland had been advised of his adversary's approach by scouts who
mingled in the ranks; though all that he seems to have apprehended, as
the purpose of a night attack had been confined to a very few, was, that
the Highland army were about to take up a position near him in order to
offer battle on the following day; for his men were ordered to seek
repose, but with their arms at hand. Besides, this vigilant commander
had a party of dragoons patrolling all night on the side next the
Insurgents, between the river Nairn and the sea. |
|
On the other hand, the
fortunes of the Insurgents were in a most critical condition. They were
without money and without provisions. Mr. Hepburn of Keith advised to
proceed; that it was easier to attack than to retreat, as they would be
compelled to fight when in a worse condition. The late Sir Henry Steuart
of Allanton, Bart., in his able review of Home's History of the
Rebellion (Anti-Jacobin Review, vols. xii. and xiii.), condemns the
resolution adopted as the worst of two evils:-
"It has always been a
favourite maxim (he argues) with the greatest generals, from Julius
Caesar to Marshal Suwarrow, rather to attack an enemy than to wait to be
attacked, for the double purpose of giving confidence to their
own troops, and striking with terror those of an |
| |
 |
| |
Dalcross Castle |
|
|
opponent. Had the
Highlanders been led on with promptness and rapidity, even after
daybreak, they would, in the first place, have possessed this unusual
advantage, and it would have been increased by their own characteristic
impetuosity." He
then points out that the character of the ground on the south of the
encampment, of which he presumes Lord George could not be ignorant, was
capable of screening the attacking party on that side from observation
and from the range of artillery; while he considers that the crossing
and recrossing of the river would have deceived the vigilance of the
enemy's spies and patrols. The situation was perhaps one of those
desperate ones where the flower Safety is only to be plucked from the
nettle Danger. It is easy, however, to allege an error in judgment after
the event; and as nothing could have been more fatal than the
predicament in which they were placed on Culloden Moor, doubtless the
attack on the camp at Nairn might have been attended with a better
issue.
The luckless Highlanders, returning by the Church of Croy, arrived about
six in the morning, fatigued, famished, and disheartened, at that part
of the Parks of Culloden indicated, as already described, by a hollow
south of the plantation outside of the birch wood west of the farm-house
of Drumbuie, and about three-fourths of a mile above Cuiloden House. In
the map, which is reduced from one published in 1845 by the late Mr.
John Gowie, land-surveyor, Inverness, the lines of march and of retreat
are both laid down to the north of Dalcross Castle. Mr. Gowie was very
painstaking, and pretty fresh information was to be then had: so that in
all probability he has succeeded in indicating the routes with
accuracy.*
[* The line of pursuit by the Royal army has, however, been brought
nearer to Dalcross Castle. There is a common tradition that the Royal
army rested in an arable field below and about a quarter of a mile from
the Castle, in which it was apprehended there would consequently be no
crop that year, whereas there was an unusually abundant one. Some other
slight corrections have also been found necessary.]
Many of the men lay down to snatch a few hours of much-needed sleep in
the open air. The whole army had bivouacked the previous night in like
fashion, without any tents or covering to protect them from the
inclemency of the weather, which was very severe and cold. Hundreds,
too, wandered away in search of wherewithal to stay the cravings of
hunger. The Prince himself could command no better refreshment than some
bread and whisky.
LORD GEORGE MURRAY.
Sir Henry Steuart, whose authority is the more trustworthy that he had
been long employed in collecting materials for a history of the
different attempts subsequent to 1688 for the restoration of the House
of Stuart, in the before-mentioned Review thus portrays the character of
Lord George Murray, on whose memory rests the praise or blame of the
retreat:-
"In the Highland army he was the person by far the best fitted for the
foremost station, and accordingly be acted as Lieutenant-General of the
forces under the orders of the Prince, who only nominally exercised the
supreme command. Lord George, as a man, had talents that were far above
mediocrity; and whatever may have been whispered by the voice of slander
he was sincerely attached to the Stuarts' cause. As a soldier he was
brave, active, and vigilant, fertile in his resources, and ardent in his
enterprises, yet what he conceived with boldness and planned with
address he was not always able to carry steadily into effect; and he was
without that firm perseverance which presses forward to its object in
spite of the caprices of accident and the unexpectedness of opposition.
It is worthy of remark that, as Lord George had the command of the Rebel
army, this want of perseverance, which he so eminently discovered, gave
a visible complexion to the chief events of the war. In the
counter-march from Derby " [of which the reviewer elsewhere says, "That
Lord George Murray, who began to waver in his resolution, was the author
of this retreat, there is no sort of doubt"] "it was fatally
conspicuous. The retreat from Stirling furnished another example; and
the failure of the night-attack at Nairn, which closed the catalogue
certainly paved the way for extinguishing the Rebellion."
|
 |
|
|
Lord George
Murray |
|
|
Sir Henry, however,
unreservedly exonerates this gallant soldier from the imputations
made on his integrity and good faith, thus - "In regard to the
question concerning Lord George Murray, it appears to us, both from
internal and external evidence, that there is not the slightest
ground for suspecting the sincerity of that spirited and able
partisan. Secretary Murray, we know, purchased his life with the
price of his honour, and was in consequence despised and reprobated
by all parties. But Lord George was incapable of an unworthy
sentiment, and his whole conduct during the war, and long after its
termination, affords the amplest evidence of an unblemished
character. He who examines his able letter to Mr. Hamilton, where
his sentiments and principles are clearly stated, and compares it
with the seeming infatuation of the Rebels before the battle of
Culloden, and the influence which Sir Thomas Sheridan and the Irish
had acquired over the Prince's mind, will at once perceive not only
that the evil originated with those weak advisers, but that no
exertion of Lord George's was left untried to preserve the army from
the catastrophe that ensued. That he imprudently, as well as
impatiently, abandoned the night attack, it is impossible to deny;
but that as well as his other errors candour will |
|
attribute to the
defects of his judgment, not to the corruption of his heart. Even late
as it was, after the countermarch from Kilravock, had his original
advice of occupying the strong ground been accepted, there is no
ascertaining to what period it might have protracted the war."
It must be observed that Lord George on all the occasions in question
carried with him the concurrence of the Highland chiefs. No wonder that
their resolution misgave them when they found themselves in the heart of
England with a handful of men, and when French and English alike gave no
sign. Lord George persevered to the utmost limit admitting of an
alternative. He out-manoeuvred the Duke in the last onward as well as in
the retrogradw movement; and at Clifton he, with Cluny's and the
Glengarry men, John Roy Stewart's regiment, and the Stuarts of Appin,
gave the dragoons a lesson which effectually prevented all further
annoyance in pursuit. But the whole was a desperate neck-or-nothing
game, in which, having once embarked, it became at every juncture about
as hazardous to recede as to go forward. Having once turned back in
their onward progress to the Capital, all hope of ultimate success at
least was at an end, and no reasonable expectation could have been
entertained, beyond that of compelling something like fair terms, by
protracting hostilities, for which the Highlands afforded every
facility. |
|
|